Gender Identity

                                     principles                           This last class focused on gender identity issues. We discussed causes of gender identity concerns, the clinical presentation, and treatment options. Concerning treatment options, although the procedure has been practiced for about 10 years in the Netherlands (and about 4 years in the U.S.), we discussed the practice of “blocking puberty” at about age 10-12 so that a several years later (around age 16) a young person can decide whether to transition to their preferred gender identity. According to the NPR report on this topic, young people who have done this appear to be satisfied with the transition (100% in a study of young people in the Netherlands). This is not the only option, of course. Others accept their biological sex and gender identity. In the study (from the Portland Clinic) mentioned in the NPR report, most young people (80%) who had been part of programs to assist them in living in conformity to their biological sex were apparently satisfied with that decision as adults.

In any case, it is a very challenging issue for everyone involved. Parents of children or teens struggle with what to do. The child or teen is often confused by how others react (not to mention the experience of dysphoria itself). Clinicians, too, may struggle with the various options that are available. Treatment options raise a number of questions about theological anthropology and ethics, among other concerns. 

We watched a couple of video clips from the Barbara Walters special on gender identity in childhood and adolescence, as well as a brief clip from Sy Rogers’ testimony (as someone who was scheduled for sex reassignment surgery before the procedure was abandoned at Johns Hopkins). As you might imagine, it was a good discussion of the challenges Christians may face in understanding the experience of transgender persons and providing services to gender dysphoric youth.

2 thoughts on “Gender Identity

  1. I don’t suppose you touched on the Cass model of identity formation? also, I’ve been turning over thoughts on integrative processes in my head for th past six months. How is sexual identity formation and integration thereof, different from integration of a religious identity?

    • Additonally, Zucker and Bailey have added a lot of literature to childhood gender identity development and true gender inversion. That barbara walters video shows almost a textbook case of an absent, uninterested, and in this case uninformed father (the mother hid the child’s feminine play from him). Couple this with a permissive, overprotective mother (again with the shielding the feminine acting child from the father) and you get a classic reparative drive resulting in complication of the Oedipal proccess.

      Just a thought. Zucker has some awesome papers on this subject.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s